BRAZZIL - News from Brazil - MONOPOLY IN BRAZIL



Are we ever going to learn?

Brazil has a history of going it alone. It happened with the world monopoly on rubber production, for example. Despite a series of disasters due to the dog-in-the manger policy, monopoly continues to be a government-blessed course of action in the country.

Wilson Velloso

In mid-January the Apple Company announced a loss of $69 million in its latest three-month business period. What has that got to do with Brazil? Plenty. Plenty because at the root of this dismal result is Apple's long standing decision to go it alone. Going it alone means more gross profit; and, even if the tax bite is bigger, the net profit is higher than is the case with the non-Apple computer companies, a community of several hundred.

Brazil has an ancient and sorry story of "going it alone". For many years, from the last century, Brazil had been the only producer of rubber in the world. It set the prices and the terms. The money rolled in. Part of it was mixed into the mortar used into the Teatro Amazonas in the jungle-capital of Manaus. British steamers sailing to Pará (Belém) did not bother going to Rio or Santos. Or anywhere else in Brazil. It was Manaus or bust.

The poor rubbertappers, who owed their souls to the company store, and were paid by the kilo, began adding rocks and other heavy debris to the rubber as the latex coagulated in big balls, in the smoke of open fires. It was their way of getting even and a bit more of money from the big rubber barons (some of whom imported Italian opera companies to sing "Aida" for them in the Teatro Amazonas). In the end, the workers' sneaky revenge did bankrupt their bloodsucking exploiters. At the same time, they torpedoed the Brazilian monopoly of rubber.

Brazilian books tell how the British "stole" 11,000 or 33,000 young plants who was counting? and smuggled them to the Far East, where they gave birth, in the Federated Malay States and other Somerset Maugham-tale areas under British control, to all Far East rubber plantations. The books never mentioned how rocks in the raw rubber balls had broken and damaged plant machinery and enraged European industrialists.

In a book written more than 60 years ago, a German "investigative reporter" called Anton Zischka, told the full story. His work, Wissenschaft bricht Monopole [Science Breaks Monopoly], relates how those uncounted thousands of tender seedlings of Hevea brasiliensis travelled to England under Equatorial sun, shaded by tarpaulins, watered several times a day, and how most wilted and died. Only a dozen and half survived. They were taken to the famous Kew Gardens, near London, where dedicated botanists babied and nurtured them, strengthened them, and finally helped them become trees. It was the much more mature and hardier Kew Garden trees that spawned the millions of rubber trees of today in Malaysia and the neighboring rubber countries.

In 1951 I wrote in Rio a melancholy article "The End of a Dream: Brazil Imports Rubber from the Orient." It was a lesson that should be taught in all classes of "Brazilian Problems" and, in depth, in courses of Economics. Is anybody listening? Has anybody learned anything?

Back to Apple: In spite of its tremendous success, its 4-year lead over IBM, its many spectacular inventions, Apple has had ups and downs in the last few years. And while it gripped jealously its monopoly, in the firm belief it had a better product and that the market would recognize it, it lost ground, the economic analysts say, because of: greed and self-centeredness.

While Apple kept everything for itself (mostly the profit), IBM got into a community of computer gear manufacturers, licensed its patents to competitors who introduced their own improvements. IBM used Intel microprocessors in large scale and worked with Microsoft (which produced its first "Disk Operating System" (DOS), and other software, then "Windows" a fabulous panoply of programs. Today Microsoft has eclipsed most US companies and, following IBM's example, has licensed scores of other makers to make DOS for many computer-makers, and much more in the wide area of software.

In spite of the debacle of its Rubber Empire, Brazil still keeps to the misguided notion that monopoly is more profitable. Yes, it is, in the short run, but Brazil is not in business for 5, 10 or 20 years. However, monopoly has been a government-blessed policy in Brazil:

The teletypewriter, invented before First World War I, and widely used worldwide, was reserved exclusively in Brazil for the armed services. It was only after the end of World War II that teletypewriting (both Telex and Teletype are registered trade marks) became generally available in the country, provided by a single operator, the Post Office. When I arrived in Washington in 1955 news from Brazil arrived at the Embassy by the dash-and-dot Morse code...

Silkscreen printing, an art of ancient Chinese origin, was introduced in Brazil under the name Planograf by a company that managed to monopolize its [public domain] technique for many years, and made a mint.

By opening the country to several automakers simultaneously, President Juscelino Kubitschek tripped a business-military cabal whose intention was to exploit the automotive industry as a monopoly.

As soon as the first small personal computers (as against the large mainframe computers sold by IBM and other US makers) arrived, their manufacture in Brazil became "reserved to National industry" actually a monopoly or a cartel under the flimsy excuse of protecting the [then nonexistent] Brazilian PC industry. The result was the manufacture of a few clunkers that were already obsolete when marketed. They were put together with parts mostly smuggled into the country. There was no genuine computer industry, only pirated copies of hardware and software.

Wrote a "cyber wag": "In the end, Brazil managed the marvel of getting 30 years behind the times in 15 years of PC marketing." Since contraband has been a flourishing national industry for many years over the porous Brazilian borders, the "market reservation" umbrella just protected the smugglers at many levels. Many people got rich through this gimmick.

Knowledgeable people who had legitimate reasons to travel frequently between the US and Brazil were approached by "Market Reservation" agents and enticed to haul to Brazil all sorts of entire computing units (CPU, keyboard, monitor, printer, cables, software). In exchange for the courtesy, the "carrier pigeons" were given tickets, per diem, expenses, and honoraria, paid in cash when the mules contacted trusted Custom officers at Galeão, Guarulhos and other Brazilian airports. When the "informal" computer market got saturated, plain-paper fax machines became the main item of trade.

The EBCT, the Brazilian Post Office façade-corporation, tried to horn into the use of fax in Brazil, taking it away from another Brazilian government provider, Telebrás. But the "Brazilian ATT" held firm and the EBCT had to retreat.

Right now, Brazilians interested in getting onto the Internet have only one gate to deal with: Embratel, the satellite company. Without any competition, setting its own rules and rates, Embratel has no interest in setting regional "hubs" to save users the real time on long distance telephone lines, some of which are hardly reliable. Embratel may charge whatever it pleases and, in theory, may refuse connections in the case of "undesirables".

Or, as they say in Brazil "Os cães ladram e a caravana passa" [The dogs bark and the caravan goes on].



Brazil / Organic personal skin care wholesale / Brazil